Nvidia has made an amazing splash recently using its double-launch of the (Maxwell) GTX 980 and GTX 970 (GPU) Graphic Cards. While the 980's price turn off all but by for the most dedicated of High Graphic game lovers, the GTX 970 commands at cost around the £300, making it some sort of easy to purchase if you really love their graphics.
However, it's some pretty cool competition, and the AMD's Radeon R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti both come with very similar prices. (See all GPU's and components reviews. )
Radeon R9 290X, coming as it does from nVidia's very hot rival, AMD, is unsurprising being a rival. However, the presence in the GTX 780 Ti is quite more unexpected, since this is the product from nVidia's past generation, Kepler, and it is effectively the GPU, and the GTX 970 might be looking to exchange.
Supplies of GTX 780 Ti cards are actually starting to sell out, and we think this GPU will not available in a couple of months time. But while it is, it's worth comparing it while using newer technology to check whether, on this occasion, old is indeed better. See also Group test: what's the most beneficial graphics card?
The Shock of the New - The GTX 970 Takes On the 780 Ti
Possibly the first surprising time of these two cards is that they are both manufactured using the same 0. 28nm processor. Traditionally, a smaller manufacturing process have been used for every single new generation of chips.
That allows the GPUs to get smaller and easy to fit on your PC, Otherwise It's hard to set new generation cards to our PC thanks for the chips that use to control the size of the Graphic Cards, and implies they generate much less heat, and it can be easily run at higher speeds for 4k games as well.
Alternatively, there's more room exists for be filled along with extra goodies. Even so, we'll have to wait a bit more time before nVidia can improve on 0.28nm, so the company has needed to look elsewhere to its new edge.
NVidia GTX 780 Ti vs NVidia GTX 970 and AMD Radeon R9 290X: Maxwell vs Kepler
Maxwell, even though, will be built up from SMMs "Streaming Multiprocessor Maxwell". These are actually considerably smaller, to ensure the newer architecture is a lot more efficient at controlling facts. There's more command over individual area, and bottlenecks has to be reduced for better gaming.
There's also much less sharing between different factors of the structures, and the high-performance L1 and also L2 memory caches are also enhanced. The L2 cache, especially, has gone upward from 512KB for you to 2MB, respectively.
NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: AMD Radeon R9 290X
How does the R9 290X enter this? Obviously, this product is likely to be still around in addition to competing with the NVidia GTX 780 Ti disappears from shelves.
Well, on paper, it comes in somewhere amongst the 970 along with the NVidia GTX 780 Ti. The standard 290X provides 2816 shader cores - only a smidge prior to the 780 Ti's 2880, and also a huge distance free from the 970's 1664 shader cores. The 290X boasts rather more texture units than the 970's, 176, contrary to the 104 of Maxwell GPU.
The 970 holds a lead with regard to core clock data transfer rates - 1178MHz as opposed to the 290X's 1GHz - but it is the 290X that wins from overall texture complete rates, touting a figure of 176GT/sec within the 970's 122. 5GT/sec.
NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: High Performance Low Power
Maxwell's awesome charm is available in its low power usage consumption. This week, it is about reducing energy, and the 970 pumps out an astonishingly low amount of wattage given the capabilities.
The GPUs feature a TDP (Thermal Style Power) figure, that estimates the amount of power your system should handle when using one of them products.
The GTX 970's TDP regarding 145 watts compares very favourably using the 170 watts quoted for most older and significantly slower GTX 760. The 780 Ti hits a fairly steep 250 watts in contrast, while the R9 290X gets nearly 300 watts, respectively.
In reality, the difference isn't quite as large, although we did frequently go to a gap of fifth there�s 89 watts under load between the R9 290X as well as the 970. The latter was also rather below the 780 Ti, this time seeing a big difference of 74 t. This is outstanding given the technological innovation, and is evidence that Maxwell really does extract performance at a fraction of the power. See also Best graphics card regarding 2014.
NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: Benchmark Tests Info-gram
Well, For the test of the GPU's bechmark. We've put versions of these cards up against another at default configurations or video settings, and across 4 different titles & three resolutions, So that you guys can easily know about the setting for your best games, Here you can check :
NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: Benchmark Tests
For the most informative decision here comes down to price and availability. There's actually very little wrong with the 780 Ti.
Kepler is probably the older technology, but cards with all the 780 Ti are usually immensely powerful. During the time of the 970's launch in October, the 780 Ti has been still rather high priced.
But prices came down, and whenever you can get a minute card for between £300 and £340, the Ti is a still the superb card.
Kepler is probably the older technology, but cards with all the 780 Ti are usually immensely powerful. During the time of the 970's launch in October, the 780 Ti has been still rather high priced.
But prices came down, and whenever you can get a minute card for between £300 and £340, the Ti is a still the superb card.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar